Skip to main content

CORE Search

Search across rules, regulations, bench books, and other ICAOS resources.

Displaying 1 - 10 of 138

Looking for information on a specific topic, training, rule, or process? Through one search here, you can find the information you need from ICAOS’ white papers, advisory opinions, bylaws, policies, Hearing Officer's Guide, rules and the bench book. All results are cross-referenced with links to make navigation easy and intuitive.

Bench Book

This section discusses the sending and receiving states' ability to impose conditions of supervision as well as sex offender registration requirements. …

Bench Book

     Rule 1.101 defines “abscond” as occurring when: (a) Supervision personnel are unable to establish contact or locate the supervised individual; and (b) The supervised individual took action to make themselves unavailable for supervision and failed to …

Bench Book

     Principal among the provisions of the ICAOS are the waiver of formal extradition requirements for returning supervised individuals who violate the terms and condition of their supervision. Article I of the ICAOS specifically provides that:  The …

Bench Book

     The ICAOS operates at the intersection of public safety, interstate cooperation, and constitutional law. Legal risk arises in two principal ways: State accountability for compact noncompliance. Member states are legally bound to follow the compact …

Bench Book

     A probable cause hearing under Rule 5.108 is not required in two common circumstances. First, when retaking is based on a new criminal conviction in the receiving state, no additional probable cause hearing is necessary. The conviction itself …

Bench Book

     When interpreting the ICAOS and its rules, eligibility for transfer depends on the nature of the offense, the sentence imposed, and the individual’s supervision status, rather than the duration of supervision remaining under Rule 3.101 . Rule 4.102 …

Bench Book

     As discussed in § 1.1, the ICAOS received advanced congressional consent pursuant to 4 U.S.C. § 112 (2024). Accordingly, as discussed in § 1.11 infra , the agreement created a compact that must be construed as federal law, enforceable on member …

Bench Book

     The Interstate Compact does not alter the authority of the sentencing court to impose restitution or other financial obligations. The imposition, modification, and enforcement of restitution remain matters of the sending state’s law and the …

Bench Book

     The Compact provides the Interstate Commission with express authority to ensure compliance. Article XI authorizes rulemaking and enforcement authority. Rule 6.102 permits corrective action when a state fails to comply with the Compact, rules, or …

Bench Book

     Some federal statutes have their own enforcement mechanism through an express or implied cause of action in the federal statute itself. See Alexander v. Sandoval , 532 U.S. 275 (2001) (applying the test through which a court determines whether a …