Skip to main content

6.2.3 Conduct That May Trigger Enforcement

Chapter 6.2.3
Effective April 1, 2026

     Substantial or persistent noncompliance may result in enforcement action. Examples include:

  • Repeated denial of mandatory transfer requests;

  • Failure to comply with required timeframes;

  • Judicial practices that allow supervised individuals to remain out of state beyond Compact limits without proper processing;

  • Improper warrant or retaking practices inconsistent with Compact rules;

  • Administrative failures such as nonpayment of dues, failure to appoint a Commissioner or maintain a State Council, or failure to comply with corrective action plans.

     Noncompliance that results in a supervised individual being improperly relocated, improperly detained, or left unsupervised increases legal and reputational risk to the state. 

Rule Comment Period is Open

At its 2026 Annual Business Meeting, the Commission will consider amendments to rules, by-laws as well as use of a Violation Response Tool to support consistent, fair, and data-informed retaking decisions.